I wanted to see if the new schools are going to schedule for a strong conference or go easy as they join the conference. The change doesn't happen this year, but I think it can give us an idea of where we are headed, strength-wise as a conference. The first team I looked at was Liberty. Liberty and NMSU both had strong schedules. For comparison purposes our schedule includes cartel royalty OU and mid-major legend Boise State. One of them is a "money game" when teams of lower conferences come in to play and pick up a check. But for cartel teams these are normal games. Our goal is to be a Boise State type of team that plays cartel teams as normal games with a chance to get big wins. So, a game against Boise is the perfect step up for us to have a chance at a feather and a win over a giant killer. Liberty has Southern Miss and UAB to start. Two conference USA traitors. Perfect way to set the tone for Liberty and send a message about where they intend to stand in the new C-USA. Then they play a cartel team in Wake Forest. Not just for the money. Then they play Akron and get a shot at sending ODU out with a kick in the pants. They go on to play national power BYU and then Arkansas. They also play VA Tech and finish with future conference mate, NMSU. Liberty is up to speed and already looking to pass us in C-USA by. This is a quick stop for them. UTEP and the rest of the conference should match their ambition and raise the entire conference level. Liberty will come into the conference claiming the top spot.
NMSU, plays everyone for money and so their upcoming schedule is really much harder to use as a measure, but figure that after years of playing all of those money games playing the leftovers and newbies of C-USA should be a challenge they feel ready for. For this upcoming season NMSU has Minnesota, Wisconsin, Mizzou, and Liberty and their other games are tough, too. NMSU will come in feeling strong enough for Conference-USA. In a very different way, NMSU is also looking to move up in the future and that come from a pure survival present.
I think looking ahead that those two won't be the weak teams of the conference. Or let me put it this way. I think they won't be the reason if the conference is a weakened conference. Actually, having an actual conference affiliation may help the Aggies recruiting-wise and make it easier to be a better team.
Jacksonville State will be stepping up to tackle an always tough Tulsa team. Rich Rodriguez has been building his team for the step up in a strategic way. I think that they will hold up their end and look to keep the bar high-at their speed, on their terms.
Sam Houston State plays Texas A&M. But they may very well win all of the rest of their games and play for a National Championship. That's how they roll. The question for them isn't about ambition or expectations. It is whether they can keep rolling their way at a bit higher level. High enough to beat Texas, Houston, or A&M? No, but high enough to beat UTEP, NMSU, and LA Tech? Well, if not today, how about in the near future. The answer is yes. Most likely. Playing at this level will attract next level players from nearby Houston to recruit from. Sam will be fine. Like lieb said, it will be about facilities limiting them. They can adjust.
Western Kentucky is already looking to move and up would be even better. But they and Middle Tennessee might just determine that this conference minus the "deadwood" might just be able to be the move up. You don't really have to worry about these two. They are ambitious.
Looking at it overall, almost all of the teams are ambitious and looking to move up. C-USA is literally a move up for some, and almost all of the new conference teams want to either move to a higher level conference or want Conference USA to move up in stature. I hate to say that of the teams that will be in the new conference, UTEP and LA Tech may be the least ambitious of them all. UTEP is thrilled to just not be the butt of jokes and LA Tech seems to have just lost their way without Holtz at the helm. I said UTEP may be the least ambitious, but I don't mean that in a bad way. We are unique. We are UTEP. Ambition for us is measured on a different scale. Our ambition to win more than two games I would bet is perhaps stronger that any other team in the country. You see, it is different. Being involved in normal ambition, if it could be done realistically, would be embraced enthusiastically, of course.
So, this year we need to root for our loyal conference mates, wish for the best possible bad outcomes for the traitors, and keep an eye on our future teammates and root for them. Of course, most of all, root for the Miners. Go, Miners!