Going into the game I told my wife I expected us to lose, possibly big, and I was just hoping to see glimpses of who we could be under Golding.
So not disappointed at all. There will be growing pains this season as the guys learn to play the Golding way.
1. NMSU is a good team. They do lots of little things well and fun to watch. They know what they are trying to do offensively and guys play within their abilities and trust each other to do exactly that. They are who we hope to be.
2. Our defensive intensity waxed and waned through the night. When we were intense, we played great defense. When we were not intense, NMSU tore us up. 100% intensity 100% of the game is the Golding style, and what we saw last night was glimpses of a Golding team with some icky CRT half-ass residue. I expect us to clean that up quickly.
3. NMSU rebounds so much better than us. We also have icky CRT residue there. The only guys that really tried to rebound were Kennedy, Tydus, and Kalu. Note that Kalu got 4 boards in 9 minutes of play. We have to fix this. If we can hustle defensively, we can hustle rebounding. Rebounding is 90% hustle. Ask Kennedy.
4. Offensively we are just lost. We look like a talented pickup team. 5 guys looking for an opportunity to jack up a 3 or take it one on five. Occasionally there was a bit of legit teamwork, but I think these guys are still trying to figure each other out, and they don't play within themselves. The three man weave we sometimes run at the beginning of an offensive set seems to have no purpose? I'm a bit concerned about all this. It's early, but...
5. I counted 4 times our big was wide open in the lane rolling off the pick. Which means there were probably more that I didn't see. Our guards saw it zero times.
6. Kennedy does so many things well, except 3s. Boum had to shake some rust off, and still scores his points by volume of shots.
7. New guys. Hollins and Sibley basically disappeared except for a very nice late 3 by Sibley. Maring utterly lost and yanked quickly. Kalu does well with his minutes. Anyone know why no Satterfield?